Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agim Ibishi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agim Ibishi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be an early-career scientist with no claim to any of the WP:NPROF criteria - I can't even manage to get an overall citation count; his database presence is too spotty, presumably because the output consists almost entirely of conference proceedings. Unless there's a surprise light hiding under a bushel somewhere, there's no chance at a notability pass here. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 04:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 04:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing any evidence to warrant notability. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- If I'd come across the page and it wasn't already up for AfD I might even have gone for CSD A7. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sign of WP:NPROF, and no other assertion or sign of notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Entirely self-sourced; he has one uncited publication listed in Google scholar. Far from WP:PROF and no other claim to notability is apparent. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete . He has a high – quality scientific references.

There are links that proof that he has published high -quality scientific articles. The user Elmidae has no arguments! He(Elmidae) is pretending that he is an ecologist but he is not! The truth is that the user Elmidae has just personal reasons. There is enough evidence. Have read references. These are very credible high – quality scientific references from USA, France, Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands and other countries around the world. All of you who are against: just read these references, then you will understand that these references are the proof. Or maybe you are not able to understand these references because you are not competent in this field. How you dear then to try to blame a scientist when you are not competent. To: David Eppstein not one publication listed in Google scholar but more than 30. Have check. He has also many high – quality publications not listed here on Wikipedia because this article about him is a new article, and it will be expanded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim Van Vlanderen (talk • contribs) 15:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, he's on to me. And here I thought the Inconspicuous Scientist cover would hold for a while longer while I pursue my personal vendetta... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Van Vlanderen, Please could you post the link to Google Scholar showing the publications? I admit I struggled to find it. Thank you. Having publications isn't sufficent to be notable, independant recognition is needed. Please take a look at WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. He is a scientist. This page is interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justine2020 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC) — Justine2020 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sock, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jim_Van_Vlanderen. Spicy (talk) 01:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE . He is a European scientist. He has a references.— Preceding unsigned comment added by YourTeacher2020 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC) — YourTeacher2020 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sock, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jim_Van_Vlanderen. Spicy (talk) 01:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.